Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 20(1): 17, 2022 Feb 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197077

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thromboinflammatory disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies and either thrombotic events or pregnancy morbidity. The objective of this study was to review a large institution's experience to better understand the characteristics of children with APS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric APS at a tertiary referral center. The electronic medical record system was queried from 2000 through 2019, and 21 cases were included based on meeting the revised Sapporo Classification criteria by age 18 or younger. Comparisons between primary and secondary APS patients were made with two-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included with a median age at diagnosis of 16 years and median follow-up of 5.8 years. Secondary APS was slightly more common than primary APS (11 vs. 10 cases) and was primarily diagnosed in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus. Two thirds of patients (67%) also had "non-criteria" manifestations of APS including thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and livedo reticularis/racemosa. Almost half of patients (43%) had recurrent thrombosis, typically when patients were subtherapeutic or non-adherent with anticoagulation. Damage Index in Patients with Thrombotic APS (DIAPS) scores indicated a chronic burden of disease in both primary and secondary APS patients. CONCLUSION: This case series of pediatric APS provides important context regarding disease phenotypes displayed by children with APS. High prevalence of non-criteria clinical manifestations highlights the need to consider these characteristics when developing pediatric-specific classification criteria and when considering this relatively rare diagnosis in pediatric practice.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antifosfolipídeos/sangue , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Agentes de Imunomodulação , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Trombose , Adolescente , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/imunologia , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/fisiopatologia , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/terapia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Agentes de Imunomodulação/classificação , Agentes de Imunomodulação/uso terapêutico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/imunologia , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Avaliação de Sintomas/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 51(3): 483-494, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176023

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the high disease burden of eczema, a contemporary overview of the patterns and trends in primary care healthcare utilization and treatment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To quantify primary care consultations, specialist referrals, prescribing, and treatment escalation, in children and adults with eczema in England. METHODS: A large primary care research database was used to examine healthcare and treatment utilization in people with active eczema (n = 411,931). Management trends and variations by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity were described from 2009 to 2018 inclusive. RESULTS: Primary care consultation rates increased from 87.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 87.3-88.3) to 112.0 (95% CI 111.5-112.6) per 100 person-years over 2009 to 2018. Specialist referral rates also increased from 3.8 (95% CI 3.7-3.9) to 5.0 (95% CI 4.9-5.1) per 100 person-years over the same period. Consultation rates were highest in infants. Specialist referrals were greatest in the over 50s and lowest in people of lower socioeconomic status, despite a higher rate of primary care consultations. There were small changes in prescribing over time; emollients increased (prescribed to 48.5% of people with active eczema in 2009 compared to 51.4% in 2018) and topical corticosteroids decreased (57.3%-52.0%). Prescribing disparities were observed, including less prescribing of potent and very potent topical corticosteroids in non-white ethnicities and people of lower socioeconomic status. Treatment escalation was more common with increasing age and in children of non-white ethnicity. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The management of eczema varies by sociodemographic status in England, with lower rates of specialist referral in people from more-deprived backgrounds. There are different patterns of healthcare utilization, treatment, and treatment escalation in people of non-white ethnicity and of more-deprived backgrounds.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Etnicidade , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Agentes de Imunomodulação/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA